Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Air Med J ; 42(6): 423-428, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996176

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Optimal management of ischemic stroke is time dependent. An understanding of patterns of air medical transport may identify disparities that could affect patient care. METHODS: In this 8-year (2007-2014) observational, retrospective, cohort study, we abstracted a 20% national sample of Medicare data from patients ≥ 66 years of age hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke who presented to the emergency department by ambulance (air or ground). RESULTS: Among 149,751 hospitalized stroke patients who arrived by ambulance, the mean age was 81.6 years (standard deviation = 8.0 years), 62.1% were female (n = 93,007), and 86.3% were White (n = 129,268). Of these, 5,534 patients (3.7%) used any form of air ambulance. Air ambulance use (2007: 2.5%, 2014: 4.9%; P < .001) and arrival at certified stroke centers (2007: 40.3%, 2014: 63.2%; P < .001) increased over time. Air ambulance use was less likely among older patients (76-85 years and >85 years vs. 66-75 years; odds ratio [OR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.72 and OR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.32-0.37, respectively) and all racial minorities except American Natives (OR = 2.07; 95% CI, 1.57-2.73) and more likely among sicker patients (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 vs. 1, OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38) and rural residents (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.64). After adjustment for covariates, air ambulance use was associated with higher odds of thrombolysis (adjusted OR = 2.57; 95% CI, 2.38-2.79). CONCLUSION: Air ambulance use is independently associated with increased thrombolysis use for stroke, but disparities exist in both air ambulance and thrombolysis use. Further research into underlying causes for these disparities would be beneficial for systems and public health-based interventions for improving outcomes for ischemic stroke.


Assuntos
AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Medicare , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia
2.
J Emerg Med ; 63(3): 363-366, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic arsenic toxicity has not been associated with terracotta pottery despite thousands of years of use in food storage and preparation. We describe a case of chronic arsenic toxicity from undiagnosed pica involving the ingestion of terracotta pots. CASE REPORT: A 49-year-old woman with a history of anemia and abnormal uterine bleeding presented to the Emergency Department complaining of lower extremity pain. She was also noted to have chronic lower extremity paresthesia, constipation, and fatigue. She admitted to ingesting glazed and unglazed terracotta pots for the past 5 years. This unusual craving was thought to be a manifestation of pica in the setting of chronic anemia. The patient was found to have an elevated urinary arsenic concentration of 116 µg/24 h. An abdominal radiograph showed opacifications throughout her bowel, and she received whole bowel irrigation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Pica is a common behavior in certain populations. Practicing clinicians should be familiar with the complications of pica, including chronic arsenic toxicity and its associated array of nonspecific symptoms.


Assuntos
Arsênio , Pica , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pica/complicações , Intestinos , Ingestão de Alimentos
3.
Resuscitation ; 124: 43-48, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305926

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend administration of 1 mg of intravenous epinephrine every 3-5 min during cardiac arrest. The optimal dose of epinephrine is not known. We evaluated the association of reduced frequency and dose of epinephrine with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: Included were patients with non-traumatic OHCA treated by advanced life support (ALS) providers from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2016. During the before period, providers were instructed to give epinephrine 1 mg intravenously at 4 min followed by additional 1 mg doses every eight minutes to patients with OHCA with a shockable rhythm and 1 mg doses every two minutes to patients with a non-shockable rhythm (higher dose). On October 1, 2012, providers were instructed to reduce the dose of epinephrine treatment during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA): 0.5 mg at 4 and 8 min followed by additional doses of 0.5 mg every 8 min for shockable rhythms and 0.5 mg every 2 min for non-shockable rhythms (lower dose). Patients with shockable initial rhythms were analyzed separately from those with non-shockable initial rhythms. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with a secondary outcome of favorable neurological status (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] 1 or 2) at hospital discharge. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to adjust for age, sex, presence of a witness, bystander CPR, and response interval. RESULTS: 2255 patients with OHCA were eligible for analysis. Of these, 24.6% had an initially shockable rhythm. Total epinephrine dose per patient decreased from a mean ±â€¯standard deviation of 3.4 ±â€¯2.3 mg-2.6 ±â€¯1.9 mg (p < 0.001) in the shockable group and 3.5 ±â€¯1.9 mg-2.8 ±â€¯1.7 mg (p < 0.001) in the non-shockable group. Among those with a shockable rhythm, survival to hospital discharge was 35.0% in the higher dose group vs. 34.2% in the lower dose group. Among those with a non-shockable rhythm, survival was 4.2% in the higher dose group vs. 5.1% in the lower dose group. Lower dose vs. higher dose was not significantly associated with survival: adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.91 (95% CI 0.62-1.32, p = 0.61) if shockable and aOR 1.26 (95% CI 0.79-2.01, p = 0.33) if non-shockable. Lower dose vs. higher dose was not significantly associated with favorable neurological status at discharge: aOR 0.84 (95% CI 0.57-1.24, p = 0.377) if shockable and aOR 1.17 (95% CI 0.68-2.02, p = 0.577) if non-shockable. CONCLUSION: Reducing the dose of epinephrine administered during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was not associated with a change in survival to hospital discharge or favorable neurological outcomes after OHCA.


Assuntos
Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Cardioversão Elétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/classificação , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...